State v. McCombs

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. McCombs

329 S.W.3d 398, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1638, 2010 WL 4751671

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 23, 2010·No. ED 93818·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Charles McCombs, appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of the Class B misdemeanor of careless and imprudent driving, in violation of section 304.012 RSMo (2000). The jury recommended a fine, which the court imposed.

No error of law appears and no jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opin *399 ion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Charles McCombs, appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of the Class B misdemeanor of careless and imprudent driving, in violation of section 304.012 RSMo (2000). The jury recommended a fine, which the court imposed.

No error of law appears and no jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opin *399 ion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. McCombs, 329 S.W.3d 398, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1638, 2010 WL 4751671 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

329 S.W.3d 398 (State v. McCombs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related