State v. Ramirez

204 P.3d 119, 226 Or. App. 471, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 140
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided March 11, 2009·No. 04085218C; A137789·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant, who pleaded guilty to attempted sexual abuse in the first degree, which is a Class C felony, see ORS 163.427(2) and ORS 161.405(2)(c), and who was, consequently, placed on probation, appeals. He contends that the trial court erred when it imposed a 60-month prison sentence after revoking his probation. The state concedes that the trial court so erred and specifically acknowledges that, “[b]ecause the [trial] court originally sentenced defendant in gridblock 6-1, which carries a presumptive sentence of probation, the maximum sentence authorized upon revocation was 6 months.” The state’s concession is well founded, see, e.g., State v. Yarborough, 223 Or App 608, 196 P3d 1032 (2008); State v. Bolf, 217 Or App 606, 176 P3d 1287 (2008), and we accept that concession.

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ramirez, 204 P.3d 119, 226 Or. App. 471, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 140 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

204 P.3d 119 (State v. Ramirez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Ramirez
204 P.3d 119 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)