State v. PYSE

366 S.W.3d 633, 2012 WL 1416819, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 551
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 24, 2012
DocketED 97145
StatusPublished

This text of 366 S.W.3d 633 (State v. PYSE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. PYSE, 366 S.W.3d 633, 2012 WL 1416819, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 551 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lucretia Brooke Pyse appeals from the sentence and judgment of attempt to manufacture methamphetamine, asserting the trial court erred in denying her motions for Judgment of Acquittal and Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict because there was insufficient evidence to prove Pyse knowingly possessed lithium batteries, Ev-erclear alcohol, or a coffee grinder with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Mo. R.Crim. P. 30.25(b) (2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glover v. LIFE SKILLS FOUNDATION
366 S.W.3d 633 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
366 S.W.3d 633, 2012 WL 1416819, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pyse-moctapp-2012.