Glover v. LIFE SKILLS FOUNDATION

Missouri Court of Appeals

Glover v. LIFE SKILLS FOUNDATION

366 S.W.3d 633, 2012 WL 1416894, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 550

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 24, 2012

DocketED 97529

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 366 S.W.3d 633 (Glover v. LIFE SKILLS FOUNDATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glover v. LIFE SKILLS FOUNDATION, 366 S.W.3d 633, 2012 WL 1416894, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 550 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lorrie Glover appeals the trial court’s judgment granting summary judgment to Life Skills Foundation in her suit asserting race discrimination, retaliation, hostile work environment, and wrongful discharge. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and conclude that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lorrie Glover appeals the trial court’s judgment granting summary judgment to Life Skills Foundation in her suit asserting race discrimination, retaliation, hostile work environment, and wrongful discharge. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and conclude that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

366 S.W.3d 633, 2012 WL 1416894, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glover-v-life-skills-foundation-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack