State v. Psaras

208 P. 1094, 121 Wash. 156, 1922 Wash. LEXIS 996
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 29, 1922
DocketNo. 17245
StatusPublished
Cited by45 cases

This text of 208 P. 1094 (State v. Psaras) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Psaras, 208 P. 1094, 121 Wash. 156, 1922 Wash. LEXIS 996 (Wash. 1922).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant in this action was charged, with the crime- of sodomy, and from his conviction thereof has appealed.

The first point urged is that the evidence was insufficient to take the case to a jury, the claim being that there was no corroboration of the prosecuting witness. Under our statute, corroboration is not necessary in such a case, but even if it were, there were facts and circumstances which tended to corroborate the story.

It is next urged that the information and also the instructions to the jury were incorrect because they ignored the element of intent. Both the information and the instructions, while they did not use the word “intentionally,” did use the word “wilfully,” which words, so far as they are here concerned, are synony[157]*157mous. In re Van Orden, 32 Misc. Rep. 215, 65 N. Y. Supp. 720; People v. Pool, 27 Cal. 572.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kelsey Lane Homeowners Ass'n v. Kelsey Lane Co.
125 Wash. App. 227 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2005)
Kelsey Lane Homeowners Ass'n v. Kelsey Lane Co., Inc.
103 P.3d 1256 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2005)
Franklin v. Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co.
586 P.2d 489 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1978)
State v. Paradis
434 P.2d 583 (Washington Supreme Court, 1967)
Freeman v. Martin
156 S.E.2d 511 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Kaiser v. Suburban Transportation System
401 P.2d 350 (Washington Supreme Court, 1965)
Phillips Co-Operative Gin Co. v. Goshen
322 S.W.2d 68 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1959)
Phillips Cooperative Gin Co. v. Toll
311 S.W.2d 171 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1958)
Halverson v. Sonotone Corp.
27 N.W.2d 596 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1947)
State v. McCollum
136 P.2d 165 (Washington Supreme Court, 1943)
Warren, Administratrix v. Hale
158 S.W.2d 51 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1942)
Modern Motors, Inc. v. Elkins
1941 OK 123 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1941)
Tennessee Valley Appliances, Inc. v. Rowden
146 S.W.2d 845 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1940)
Nichols v. G. L. Hight Motor Co.
10 S.E.2d 439 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
In Re the Guardianship of Brown
107 P.2d 1104 (Washington Supreme Court, 1940)
Chatelain v. Thackeray
100 P.2d 191 (Utah Supreme Court, 1940)
Ryan-Richards, Inc. v. Whitesides
96 F.2d 826 (Tenth Circuit, 1938)
Bourus v. Hagen
74 P.2d 205 (Washington Supreme Court, 1937)
Meyn v. Dulaney-Miller Auto Co.
191 S.E. 558 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1937)
Northwest States Utilities Co. v. Ashton
65 P.2d 235 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 P. 1094, 121 Wash. 156, 1922 Wash. LEXIS 996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-psaras-wash-1922.