State v. Prosser

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Prosser

131 S.W.3d 858, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 539, 2004 WL 770367

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 13, 2004

DocketED 82786

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 131 S.W.3d 858 (State v. Prosser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Prosser, 131 S.W.3d 858, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 539, 2004 WL 770367 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals pro se the judgment denying his Rule 29.05 motion, filed on March 14, 2003, to reduce as excessive the sentence he received in 1992 on his conviction of second-degree murder. The trial court dismissed the motion on the grounds it lacked jurisdiction.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The trial court lacked jurisdiction to modify defendant’s sentence under Rule 29.05 after it filed its sentence on December 4, 1992. State v. Van Sickel, 726 S.W.2d 392, 393 (Mo.App.1987).

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI