Missey v. State
This text of 320 S.W.3d 738 (Missey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The movant, David Missey, Sr., appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 S.W.3d 738, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1261, 2010 WL 3681392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/missey-v-state-moctapp-2010.