Missey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Missey v. State

320 S.W.3d 738, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1261, 2010 WL 3681392

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 21, 2010·No. ED 94238·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, David Missey, Sr., appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, David Missey, Sr., appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Missey v. State, 320 S.W.3d 738, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1261, 2010 WL 3681392 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

320 S.W.3d 738 (Missey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related