State v. Prince

571 So. 2d 45, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8545, 1990 WL 175904
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 14, 1990
DocketNo. 90-1842
StatusPublished

This text of 571 So. 2d 45 (State v. Prince) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Prince, 571 So. 2d 45, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8545, 1990 WL 175904 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for certiorari, quash the trial court order compelling disclosure, and direct the court to hold an in-camera hearing of the confidential informant’s involvement prior to ordering disclosure. State v. Kakas, 568 So.2d 126 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); State v. Williams, 369 So.2d 416 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Williams
369 So. 2d 416 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
State v. Kakas
568 So. 2d 126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
571 So. 2d 45, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8545, 1990 WL 175904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-prince-fladistctapp-1990.