State v. Kakas

568 So. 2d 126, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8181, 1990 WL 159663
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 22, 1990
DocketNo. 90-0582
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 568 So. 2d 126 (State v. Kakas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Kakas, 568 So. 2d 126, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8181, 1990 WL 159663 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have sua sponte withdrawn our previously issued opinion in this case and substituted this opinion in its place, to correct the caption and identify all party respondents.

[127]*127The state’s petition for writ of certiorari is granted. We quash the trial court order compelling disclosure and remand the cause to the trial court to conduct an in-camera hearing to determine whether the testimony of the confidential informant would be helpful to the defense. State v. Williams, 369 So.2d 416 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). We note the absence of direct testimony of entrapment in the record.

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Prince
571 So. 2d 45 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
568 So. 2d 126, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8181, 1990 WL 159663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kakas-fladistctapp-1990.