State v. Price

605 So. 2d 1019, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10702, 1992 WL 281865
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Price. Read the opinion of the Court — 564 So. 2d 1239
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 1992·No. No. 91-2594·Published

Opinion

COWART, Judge.

On this appeal by the State we vacate the defendant’s sentence on his grand theft conviction because the sentence departs downward from the sentencing guidelines recommended and permitted ranges. The trial judge’s written reason for departure was his understanding that the State had agreed to the downward departure sentence. However, the record does not show that the State agreed to the sentence imposed and further shows that the prosecutor’s sentencing recommendation was made prior to the court’s consideration of additional material which- caused an increase in the guidelines scoresheet total and correspondingly in the recommended range. The sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing.

SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED.

COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Price, 605 So. 2d 1019, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10702, 1992 WL 281865 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

605 So. 2d 1019 (State v. Price) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.