State v. Price

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Price

637 So. 2d 383, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5657, 1994 WL 248076

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 8, 1994

DocketNo. 91-03781

StatusPublished

This text of 637 So. 2d 383 (State v. Price) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Price, 637 So. 2d 383, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5657, 1994 WL 248076 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based upon two recent decisions of the supreme court, we reverse this case and remand it for further proceedings in the county court.

Two issues were argued in this appeal. The first issue presented was whether the HRS rules governing inspections of breath testing instruments are unconstitutionally vague. In State v. Veilleux, 635 So.2d 977 (Fla.1994), the supreme court concluded that the rules were not unconstitutionally vague. See also State v. Berger, 605 So.2d 488 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). The second issue presented was whether this court improvidently accepted jurisdiction of this appeal. The supreme court’s decision in Blore v. Fierro, 636 So.2d 1329, (Fla.1994), established that this court had jurisdiction.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings in the county court.

HALL, A.C.J., and PARKER and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based upon two recent decisions of the supreme court, we reverse this case and remand it for further proceedings in the county court.

Two issues were argued in this appeal. The first issue presented was whether the HRS rules governing inspections of breath testing instruments are unconstitutionally vague. In State v. Veilleux, 635 So.2d 977 (Fla.1994), the supreme court concluded that the rules were not unconstitutionally vague. See also State v. Berger, 605 So.2d 488 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). The second issue presented was whether this court improvidently accepted jurisdiction of this appeal. The supreme court’s decision in Blore v. Fierro, 636 So.2d 1329, (Fla.1994), established that this court had jurisdiction.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings in the county court.

HALL, A.C.J., and PARKER and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

637 So. 2d 383, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5657, 1994 WL 248076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-price-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack