State v. Prevette
This text of 261 S.E.2d 925 (State v. Prevette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Gaither Dean PREVETTE, William Norman Stafford, Walter Lee St. John, Randy Marylon Grimes, Phillip Mark Sutton, Francis Earl Wood.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Isham B. Hudson, for State.
Gerrans & Spence, for defendants, Prevette, Stafford, St. John and Grimes.
White, Allen, Hooten, Hodges & Hines, for defendants, Sutton and Wood.
Defendants' notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review under G.S. § 731, 43 N.C.App. 450, 259 S.E.2d 595. Motion of the State to dismiss the appeal for lack *926 of substantial constitutional question. Petition denied; motion allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 S.E.2d 925, 299 N.C. 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-prevette-nc-1980.