State v. Pratt

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Pratt. Read the opinion of the Court — 127 Haw. 206
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided March 18, 2011·No. SCWC-27897·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-27897

18-MAR-2011

01:04 PM

SCWC-27897

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.

LLOYD PRATT, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NOS. 27897, 27898 and 27899)

(CR. NOS. HC04-147, HC04-169 AND HC04-299 - CONSOLIDATED)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI FILED MARCH 14, 2011 AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

(By: Nakayama, J.)

Upon consideration of Petitioner’s motion to withdraw

application for writ of certiorari filed March 14, 2011 at 3:45

p.m. in errata and substitute correct application filed on

March 15, 2011 at 2:42 pm and the record herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the motion is granted. The

application for writ of certiorari filed on March 14, 2011 is

withdrawn.

It appearing that the March 15, 2011 application for writ of certiorari exceeds the page limit imposed by Rule 40.1(d) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Daniel G. Hempey, counsel for

Petitioner Lloyd Pratt, shall, within 10 days after entry of this

order, show cause as to why he should not be sanctioned and the

application dismissed. Failure to respond or to show good cause

will result in sanctions.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, March 18, 2011.

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pratt, (haw 2011).

State v. Pratt (State v. Pratt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.