State v. Pratt
This text of State v. Pratt (State v. Pratt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-27897 18-MAR-2011 01:04 PM
SCWC-27897
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
LLOYD PRATT, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(ICA NOS. 27897, 27898 and 27899)
(CR. NOS. HC04-147, HC04-169 AND HC04-299 - CONSOLIDATED)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW
APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI FILED MARCH 14, 2011
AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
(By: Nakayama, J.)
Upon consideration of Petitioner’s motion to withdraw
application for writ of certiorari filed March 14, 2011 at 3:45
p.m. in errata and substitute correct application filed on
March 15, 2011 at 2:42 pm and the record herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the motion is granted. The
application for writ of certiorari filed on March 14, 2011 is
withdrawn.
It appearing that the March 15, 2011 application for
writ of certiorari exceeds the page limit imposed by Rule 40.1(d)
of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Daniel G. Hempey, counsel for
Petitioner Lloyd Pratt, shall, within 10 days after entry of this
order, show cause as to why he should not be sanctioned and the
application dismissed. Failure to respond or to show good cause
will result in sanctions.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, March 18, 2011.
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
Associate Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Pratt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pratt-haw-2011.