State v. Powell

119 So. 879, 167 La. 577, 1929 La. LEXIS 1659
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 2, 1929·No. No. 29623.·Published

Opinion

BRTJNOT, J.

Appellants were indicted, arraigned, tried, and convicted of the crime of assault with intent to murder. Each of the defendants was sentenced to serve a term in the Louisiana State Penitentiary. From the verdict and sentence both appealed.

There is no bill of exception or assignment of error in the record; no error is patent on its face, and defendants have not filed a brief in the ease. State v. Mann, 163 La. 477, 112 So. 304; State v. Hamilton, 164 La. 717, 114 So. 605.

There are no jurisdictional questions involved.

The minutes show that counsel for defendants excepted to the overruling of a motion for a new trial," but no bill was reserved to the ruling. State ex rel. Markham v. Read, 52 La. Ann. 271, 26 So. 826; State v. Evans, 135 La. 891, 66 So. 259; State v. Foster, 164 La. 840, 114 So. 696; State v. Cockerham, 165 La. 559, 115 So. 750.

The verdict and sentence are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Powell, 119 So. 879, 167 La. 577, 1929 La. LEXIS 1659 (La. 1929).

119 So. 879 (State v. Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mann
112 So. 304 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)
State v. Cockerham
115 So. 750 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1928)
State v. Foster
114 So. 696 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)
State v. Hamilton
114 So. 605 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)
State v. Evans
66 So. 259 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1914)
State ex rel. Markham v. Read
52 La. Ann. 271 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1899)