State v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Hamilton

114 So. 605, 164 La. 717, 1927 La. LEXIS 1808

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 31, 1927

DocketNo. 28724.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 114 So. 605 (State v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hamilton, 114 So. 605, 164 La. 717, 1927 La. LEXIS 1808 (La. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

OYERTON, J.

Defendant was convicted of breaking and entering a dwelling house in the nighttime with intent to steal. The record contains no bill of exception, no assignment of error, no error patent upon its face, and no brief in behalf of defendant. Therefore there is nothing to do but to affirm the verdict and the sentence.

For the reasons assigned, the verdict and the sentence appealed from are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OYERTON, J.

Defendant was convicted of breaking and entering a dwelling house in the nighttime with intent to steal. The record contains no bill of exception, no assignment of error, no error patent upon its face, and no brief in behalf of defendant. Therefore there is nothing to do but to affirm the verdict and the sentence.

For the reasons assigned, the verdict and the sentence appealed from are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 So. 605, 164 La. 717, 1927 La. LEXIS 1808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hamilton-la-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack