State v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Hamilton

114 So. 605, 164 La. 717, 1927 La. LEXIS 1808

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 31, 1927·No. No. 28724.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OYERTON, J.

Defendant was convicted of breaking and entering a dwelling house in the nighttime with intent to steal. The record contains no bill of exception, no assignment of error, no error patent upon its face, and no brief in behalf of defendant. Therefore there is nothing to do but to affirm the verdict and the sentence.

For the reasons assigned, the verdict and the sentence appealed from are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OYERTON, J.

Defendant was convicted of breaking and entering a dwelling house in the nighttime with intent to steal. The record contains no bill of exception, no assignment of error, no error patent upon its face, and no brief in behalf of defendant. Therefore there is nothing to do but to affirm the verdict and the sentence.

For the reasons assigned, the verdict and the sentence appealed from are affirmed.

State v. Hamilton, 114 So. 605, 164 La. 717, 1927 La. LEXIS 1808 (La. 1927).

Pincite

114 So. 605 (State v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related