State v. Porter

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Porter

925 N.E.2d 139, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1237

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 4, 2010·No. No. 2009-1252·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The motion for reconsideration is granted to the following extent: The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., concurs for the reasons stated in her concurring opinion in State v. Fuller, 124 Ohio St.3d 543, 2010-Ohio-726. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Fuller, 124 Ohio St.3d 543, 2010-Ohio-726.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The motion for reconsideration is granted to the following extent: The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., concurs for the reasons stated in her concurring opinion in State v. Fuller, 124 Ohio St.3d 543, 2010-Ohio-726. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Fuller, 124 Ohio St.3d 543, 2010-Ohio-726.

State v. Porter, 925 N.E.2d 139, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1237 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

925 N.E.2d 139 (State v. Porter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related