State v. Pleasant
This text of 541 So. 2d 401 (State v. Pleasant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Roselia PLEASANT.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.
Harry F. Connick, Dist. Atty., Beryl McSmith, Asst. Dist. Atty., New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee State.
Sherry Watters, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant Roselia Pleasant.
Before KLEES, BYRNES, and WARD, JJ.
KLEES, Judge.
The defendant Roselia Pleasant was charged by indictment on October 28, 1987 with distribution of heroin, a violation of R.S. 40:966, and attempt first degree murder, a violation of R.S. 14:27(D)(3). On February 29, 1988, a twelve-member jury found the defendant guilty of distribution of heroin and guilty of aggravated battery. The defendant was sentenced on April 12, 1988 to serve life imprisonment at hard labor on the heroin charge and ten (10) years at hard labor on the aggravated battery charge.
A. Errors Patent
A review of the record reveals no errors patent.
B. Assignment of Error
By the defendant's single assignment of error, she contends that the trial court erred by denying her parole eligibility. According to the minute entry from sentencing, the trial court denied parole eligibility. However, the sentencing transcript reveals that the trial court did not deny parole eligibility. In such situations, the transcript is controlling. State v. Herbert, 508 So.2d 973 (La.App. 4th Cir.1987). This assignment is without merit.
Accordingly, the defendant's convictions and sentences are hereby affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
541 So. 2d 401, 1989 WL 29053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pleasant-lactapp-1989.