Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Pierce

State v. Pierce

877 N.E.2d 989, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1437
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 12, 2007
Docket2007-1605
StatusPublished

This text of 877 N.E.2d 989 (State v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Pierce, 877 N.E.2d 989, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1437 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 88470, 2007-Ohio-3665. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. Ill and IV; cause held for the decision in 2006-2187, Hyle v. Porter, Hamilton App. No. C-050768, 170 Ohio App.3d 710, 2006-Ohio-5454; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. Ill only. Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on all other Propositions of Law. Lanzinger, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. V and VI. Cupp, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II without holding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Pierce, 88470 (7-19-2007)
2007 Ohio 3665 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Hyle v. Porter
868 N.E.2d 1047 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
877 N.E.2d 989, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pierce-ohio-2007.