State v. Pierce

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Pierce

877 N.E.2d 989, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1437

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 12, 2007·No. 2007-1605·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 88470, 2007-Ohio-3665. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. Ill and IV; cause held for the decision in 2006-2187, Hyle v. Porter, Hamilton App. No. C-050768, 170 Ohio App.3d 710, 2006-Ohio-5454; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. Ill only. Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on all other Propositions of Law. Lanzinger, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. V and VI. Cupp, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II without holding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 88470, 2007-Ohio-3665. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. Ill and IV; cause held for the decision in 2006-2187, Hyle v. Porter, Hamilton App. No. C-050768, 170 Ohio App.3d 710, 2006-Ohio-5454; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. Ill only. Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on all other Propositions of Law. Lanzinger, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. V and VI. Cupp, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II without holding.

State v. Pierce, 877 N.E.2d 989, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1437 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

877 N.E.2d 989 (State v. Pierce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related