State v. Pierce

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Pierce

1999 Ohio 452, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1204

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 31, 1999

Docket1998-0526

StatusPublished

This text of 1999 Ohio 452 (State v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Pierce, 1999 Ohio 452, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1204 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 1204.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. PIERCE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Pierce, 1999-Ohio-452.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 98-526—Submitted February 24, 1999—Decided March 31, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APA06-810. __________________ Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Amy H. Kulesa, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Judith M. Stevenson, Franklin County Public Defender, John W. Keeling and M. Catherine Kurila, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 1204.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. PIERCE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Pierce, 1999-Ohio-452.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 98-526—Submitted February 24, 1999—Decided March 31, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APA06-810. __________________ Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Amy H. Kulesa, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Judith M. Stevenson, Franklin County Public Defender, John W. Keeling and M. Catherine Kurila, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1999 Ohio 452, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pierce-ohio-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack