State v. Pierce

659 N.E.2d 1252, 74 Ohio St. 3d 453
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 7, 1996·No. No. 95-1830·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in its opinion.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pierce, 659 N.E.2d 1252, 74 Ohio St. 3d 453 (Ohio 1996).

659 N.E.2d 1252 (State v. Pierce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Colbert v. Tambi
513 F. Supp. 2d 927 (S.D. Ohio, 2007)
Van Hook v. Anderson
127 F. Supp. 2d 899 (S.D. Ohio, 2001)
State v. Pierce
1996 Ohio 20 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)