State v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Phillips

24 So. 2d 374, 209 La. 194, 1945 La. LEXIS 925

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedDecember 10, 1945

DocketNo. 37923.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 24 So. 2d 374 (State v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Phillips, 24 So. 2d 374, 209 La. 194, 1945 La. LEXIS 925 (La. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

FOURNET, Justice.

The state has filed a motion here to have the defendant’s appeal from his conviction and sentence on • a charge of receiving and concealing stolen property dismissed on the ground that the motion for the appeal was taken and signed in chambers and not in open court, as required by Article 542 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

*195 Conceding, for the purpose of this decision, that the appeal was properly lodged here, the position most favorable to the accused, we find that the case presents nothing for our review, for it is another of those appeals taken where no bills of exceptions were either filed or perfected and there is no error patent on the face of the record.

For the reasons assigned the conviction and sentence are affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOURNET, Justice.

The state has filed a motion here to have the defendant’s appeal from his conviction and sentence on • a charge of receiving and concealing stolen property dismissed on the ground that the motion for the appeal was taken and signed in chambers and not in open court, as required by Article 542 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

*195 Conceding, for the purpose of this decision, that the appeal was properly lodged here, the position most favorable to the accused, we find that the case presents nothing for our review, for it is another of those appeals taken where no bills of exceptions were either filed or perfected and there is no error patent on the face of the record.

For the reasons assigned the conviction and sentence are affirmed,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 So. 2d 374, 209 La. 194, 1945 La. LEXIS 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-phillips-la-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack