State v. Lorello

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Lorello

62 So. 2d 402, 222 La. 268, 1952 La. LEXIS 1330

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedDecember 15, 1952

DocketNo. 40973

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 62 So. 2d 402 (State v. Lorello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lorello, 62 So. 2d 402, 222 La. 268, 1952 La. LEXIS 1330 (La. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

PONDER, Justice.

The defendant- was found guilty of illegal possession of narcotics and as a multiple offender was sentenced to imprisonment in the State Penitentiary at hard labor for the balance of his natural life. He has appealed to this Court from his conviction and sentence.

The case presents nothing for our review, there being no ‘bills of exceptions filed or perfected and no error patent on the face of the- record. State v. Phillips, 209 La. 194, 24 So.2d 374.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PONDER, Justice.

The defendant- was found guilty of illegal possession of narcotics and as a multiple offender was sentenced to imprisonment in the State Penitentiary at hard labor for the balance of his natural life. He has appealed to this Court from his conviction and sentence.

The case presents nothing for our review, there being no ‘bills of exceptions filed or perfected and no error patent on the face of the- record. State v. Phillips, 209 La. 194, 24 So.2d 374.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 So. 2d 402, 222 La. 268, 1952 La. LEXIS 1330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lorello-la-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack