State v. Philip Morris Inc.

269 A.D.2d 268, 702 N.Y.S.2d 829, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1571
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 17, 2000·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered August 23, 1999, which denied the proposed intervenors’ motion to intervene as untimely, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court properly exercised its discretion in denying the motion to intervene as untimely since the proposed intervenors submitted their motion eight months after the IAS Court entered its order approving the Master Settlement Agreement and more than a month after this Court affirmed that order (see, CPLR 1012, 1013). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Philip Morris Inc., 269 A.D.2d 268, 702 N.Y.S.2d 829, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

269 A.D.2d 268 (State v. Philip Morris Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Rosenthal
99 A.D.3d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
State v. Philip Morris Inc.
308 A.D.2d 57 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)