State v. Philip Morris Inc.

269 A.D.2d 268, 702 N.Y.S.2d 829, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1571
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 17, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 269 A.D.2d 268 (State v. Philip Morris Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Philip Morris Inc., 269 A.D.2d 268, 702 N.Y.S.2d 829, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered August 23, 1999, which denied the proposed intervenors’ motion to intervene as untimely, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court properly exercised its discretion in denying the motion to intervene as untimely since the proposed intervenors submitted their motion eight months after the IAS Court entered its order approving the Master Settlement Agreement and more than a month after this Court affirmed that order (see, CPLR 1012, 1013). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Rosenthal
99 A.D.3d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
State v. Philip Morris Inc.
308 A.D.2d 57 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 268, 702 N.Y.S.2d 829, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-philip-morris-inc-nyappdiv-2000.