State v. Pettypool

676 P.2d 368, 67 Or. App. 13, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2811
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 15, 1984·No. 42007; CA A28754·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The only error assigned on appeal is that defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel. That claim requires an evidentiary hearing and, except in extraordinary cases, may not be raised on direct appeal. State v. Chase, 51 Or App 289, 624 P2d 1100 (1981). Because this is not such a case, the issue must be resolved by habeas corpus proceedings where, as here, defendant has not been convicted of a crime, ORS 138.510(1), but has been found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, and the court found that defendant would have been convicted of the crime if she had been found responsible.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pettypool, 676 P.2d 368, 67 Or. App. 13, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2811 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).

676 P.2d 368 (State v. Pettypool) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Jester
228 P.3d 1232 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)
Mueller v. Benning
841 P.2d 640 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1992)
State v. England
376 S.E.2d 548 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. McKarge
717 P.2d 656 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
State v. Pettypool
676 P.2d 368 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1984)