State v. Peterson

95 S.W.3d 194, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 93, 2003 WL 179365
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 28, 2003·No. WD 60484·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

After a jury convicted Appellant, James L., Peterson, of murder in the. second degree and armed criminal action, he was sentenced as a prior offender to consecutive terms of life imprisonment and thirty years for the convictions.

On appeal, he alleges that the trial court: (1) erred in admitting hearsay testimony, (2) abused its discretion in admitting evidence of a prior uncharged crime or bad act, and (3) plainly erred in not declaring a mistrial, sua sponte, when the State referred to matters outside of the presented evidence in its closing argument.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Peterson, 95 S.W.3d 194, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 93, 2003 WL 179365 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

95 S.W.3d 194 (State v. Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peterson v. State
149 S.W.3d 583 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004)