Peterson v. State

140 S.W.3d 616, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1134, 2004 WL 1773401
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 10, 2004
DocketNo. WD 62702
StatusPublished

This text of 140 S.W.3d 616 (Peterson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peterson v. State, 140 S.W.3d 616, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1134, 2004 WL 1773401 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brian L. Peterson appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, following an evidentiary hearing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 S.W.3d 616, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1134, 2004 WL 1773401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-state-moctapp-2004.