State v. Perkins
This text of 171 Iowa 1 (State v. Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In these circumstances, the trial court should have instructed upon the included offense, and left it to the jury to say whether or not the defendant should have been convicted of this offense, rather than some higher degree of crime. State v. Kyne, 86 Iowa 616; State v. Hutchinson, 95 Iowa 566; State v. Barkley, 129 Iowa 484; State v. Egbert, 125 Iowa 443; State v. Trusty, 118 Iowa 498; State v. Harrison, 167 Iowa 334.
Neither the fact that defendant was convicted of an assault with intent, nor that the court did instruct as to simple assault, obviates the error in failing to instruct as to assault and battery. This is pointed out in the authorities already cited.
To avoid misapprehension, it is to be observed that the prosecutrix was over the age of consent, she being twenty years of age.
[3]*3For tbe error pointed out, the judgment must be, and it is, reversed and the cause remanded. — Reversed md Remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 Iowa 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-perkins-iowa-1915.