State v. Perez
This text of 966 So. 2d 818 (State v. Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Fay PEREZ, III.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
*819 Michael Harson, District Attorney, Ted L. Ayo, Assistant District Attorney, Abbeville, Louisiana, for State of Louisiana.
Mark O. Foster, Louisiana Appellate Project, Natchitoches, Louisiana, for Defendant/Appellant, Fay V. Perez, III.
Court composed of ULYSSES GENE THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge, MARC T. AMY, and MICHAEL G. SULLIVAN, Judges.
SULLIVAN, Judge.
For the reasons assigned in State v. Perez, 07-229 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/3/07), 966 So.2d 813, 2007 WL 2850578, this matter is remanded to the trial court for another evidentiary hearing to determine whether the State's agreement to Defendant's plea was invalidated by vacation of the restitution to victims whose cases were dismissed. If the trial court imposes restitution as a condition of probation, it is instructed not to order restitution to a victim's insurer and to establish a determinate, specified payment plan for all fees and restitution amounts.
REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
966 So. 2d 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-perez-lactapp-2007.