State v. Penn

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Penn

169 S.W.3d 558, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1235, 2005 WL 2007095

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 23, 2005

DocketED 84686

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 169 S.W.3d 558 (State v. Penn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Penn, 169 S.W.3d 558, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1235, 2005 WL 2007095 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stanley D. Penn (hereinafter, “Defendant”) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of distribution of a controlled substance, Section 195.211 RSMo (2000) 1 , and sale of a controlled substance, Section 195.211. The trial court sentenced Defendant to two concurrent six year terms of imprisonment. Defendant raises two points on appeal, claiming his right not to testify was violated and the trial court’s failure to act sua sponte resulted in manifest injustice.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All farther statutory citations are to RSMo (2000) unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI