Purcell v. JEROME L. HOWE, INC.

169 S.W.3d 558, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1240, 2005 WL 2007146
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 23, 2005·No. ED 85585·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*559 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Peggy Purcell appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing her petition against Jerome L. Howe, Inc. alleging employment discrimination under the Missouri Human Rights Act for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purposes would be served by an opinion restating the detailed facts and the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their purposes only explaining the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Purcell v. JEROME L. HOWE, INC., 169 S.W.3d 558, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1240, 2005 WL 2007146 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

169 S.W.3d 558 (Purcell v. JEROME L. HOWE, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Penn
169 S.W.3d 558 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)