Purcell v. JEROME L. HOWE, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Purcell v. JEROME L. HOWE, INC.

169 S.W.3d 558, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1240, 2005 WL 2007146

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 23, 2005

DocketED 85585

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 169 S.W.3d 558 (Purcell v. JEROME L. HOWE, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Purcell v. JEROME L. HOWE, INC., 169 S.W.3d 558, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1240, 2005 WL 2007146 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

*559 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Peggy Purcell appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing her petition against Jerome L. Howe, Inc. alleging employment discrimination under the Missouri Human Rights Act for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purposes would be served by an opinion restating the detailed facts and the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their purposes only explaining the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*559 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Peggy Purcell appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing her petition against Jerome L. Howe, Inc. alleging employment discrimination under the Missouri Human Rights Act for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purposes would be served by an opinion restating the detailed facts and the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their purposes only explaining the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 S.W.3d 558, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1240, 2005 WL 2007146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purcell-v-jerome-l-howe-inc-moctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack