State v. Peed
999 P.2d 1215, 167 Or. App. 156, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 724
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Peed. Read the opinion of the Court — 168 Or. App. 236 →
Opinion
Defendant appeals his convictions for several sexual crimes. On appeal, he demurs, for the first time, to counts 1 and 2 on the ground that the indictment fails to state a crime. See State v. Young, 161 Or App 507, 509-12, 985 P2d 835 (1999), rev den 329 Or 590 (2000) (a defendant may demur to the indictment, for failure to state a crime, for the first time on appeal). The state concedes error, and we agree.
Defendant’s other arguments do not require discussion.
Judgments of conviction and sentence on counts 1 and 2 reversed; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Peed, 999 P.2d 1215, 167 Or. App. 156, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 724 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).
999 P.2d 1215 (State v. Peed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Young
985 P.2d 835 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1999)