Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Peed

State v. Peed

999 P.2d 1215, 167 Or. App. 156, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 724
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 3, 2000
Docket97CR0115; CA A101254
StatusPublished

This text of 999 P.2d 1215 (State v. Peed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Peed, 999 P.2d 1215, 167 Or. App. 156, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 724 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions for several sexual crimes. On appeal, he demurs, for the first time, to counts 1 and 2 on the ground that the indictment fails to state a crime. See State v. Young, 161 Or App 507, 509-12, 985 P2d 835 (1999), rev den 329 Or 590 (2000) (a defendant may demur to the indictment, for failure to state a crime, for the first time on appeal). The state concedes error, and we agree.

Defendant’s other arguments do not require discussion.

Judgments of conviction and sentence on counts 1 and 2 reversed; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Young
985 P.2d 835 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
999 P.2d 1215, 167 Or. App. 156, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-peed-orctapp-2000.