State v. Payne

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Payne

188 S.W.3d 477, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 435, 2006 WL 923535

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 11, 2006

DocketWD 65584

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 188 S.W.3d 477 (State v. Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Payne, 188 S.W.3d 477, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 435, 2006 WL 923535 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James L. Payne (Appellant) appeals the trial court’s order denying his conditional release, section 552.040, RSMo 2000. He claims that he proved by clear and convincing evidence that he was no longer dangerous to others. This court disagrees with Appellant and affirms the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s conditional release. Because a full opinion in this case has no precedential value, this court enters a written order and memorandum decision under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James L. Payne (Appellant) appeals the trial court’s order denying his conditional release, section 552.040, RSMo 2000. He claims that he proved by clear and convincing evidence that he was no longer dangerous to others. This court disagrees with Appellant and affirms the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s conditional release. Because a full opinion in this case has no precedential value, this court enters a written order and memorandum decision under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 S.W.3d 477, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 435, 2006 WL 923535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-payne-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack