Norwood v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Norwood v. State

188 S.W.3d 477, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 451, 2006 WL 923539

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 11, 2006

DocketWD 65132

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 188 S.W.3d 477 (Norwood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norwood v. State, 188 S.W.3d 477, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 451, 2006 WL 923539 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Norwood was charged with first-degree robbery. The trial court accepted his plea of guilty. Norwood timely filed a post-conviction motion for relief pursuant to 24.035 which was denied without evidentiary hearing by the motion court. Norwood appeals, arguing that there was not a sufficient factual basis to support his guilty plea. After review of the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we find no error and affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Norwood was charged with first-degree robbery. The trial court accepted his plea of guilty. Norwood timely filed a post-conviction motion for relief pursuant to 24.035 which was denied without evidentiary hearing by the motion court. Norwood appeals, arguing that there was not a sufficient factual basis to support his guilty plea. After review of the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we find no error and affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 S.W.3d 477, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 451, 2006 WL 923539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norwood-v-state-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack