Norwood v. State

188 S.W.3d 477, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 451, 2006 WL 923539
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 11, 2006·No. WD 65132·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Norwood was charged with first-degree robbery. The trial court accepted his plea of guilty. Norwood timely filed a post-conviction motion for relief pursuant to 24.035 which was denied without evidentiary hearing by the motion court. Norwood appeals, arguing that there was not a sufficient factual basis to support his guilty plea. After review of the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we find no error and affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norwood v. State, 188 S.W.3d 477, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 451, 2006 WL 923539 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

188 S.W.3d 477 (Norwood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Payne
188 S.W.3d 477 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)