State v. Patterson
This text of 637 A.2d 599 (State v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLES PATTERSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
RONALD JOHNSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN and LEVY.
John Kaye, Monmouth County Prosecutor, attorney for appellant (Mark P. Stalford, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel).
Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney for respondent Patterson (Linda Mehling, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel and on the letter brief).
Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney for respondent Johnson (Mordecai Garelick, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel and on the letter brief).
PER CURIAM.
The order dated January 22, 1993, suppressing evidence seized from defendants is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge O'Hagan in his opinion reported at 270 N.J. Super. 550, 637 A.2d 593 (Law Div. 1994).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
637 A.2d 599, 270 N.J. Super. 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-patterson-njsuperctappdiv-1994.