State v. Patterson

637 A.2d 599, 270 N.J. Super. 562
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided February 18, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

270 N.J. Super. 562 (1994)
637 A.2d 599

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLES PATTERSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
RONALD JOHNSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted January 24, 1994.
Decided February 18, 1994.

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN and LEVY.

John Kaye, Monmouth County Prosecutor, attorney for appellant (Mark P. Stalford, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel).

Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney for respondent Patterson (Linda Mehling, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel and on the letter brief).

Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney for respondent Johnson (Mordecai Garelick, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel and on the letter brief).

PER CURIAM.

The order dated January 22, 1993, suppressing evidence seized from defendants is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge O'Hagan in his opinion reported at 270 N.J. Super. 550, 637 A.2d 593 (Law Div. 1994).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Patterson, 637 A.2d 599, 270 N.J. Super. 562 (N.J. Ct. App. 1994).

637 A.2d 599 (State v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Stovall
788 A.2d 746 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2002)