State v. Papandrea
994 A.2d 1289, 297 Conn. 902, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 188
This text of 994 A.2d 1289 (State v. Papandrea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Papandrea, 994 A.2d 1289, 297 Conn. 902, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 188 (Colo. 2010).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 224 (AC 29768), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the state of Connecticut had presented sufficient evidence of the defendant’s intent to commit larceny?”
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Papandrea
26 A.3d 75 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
994 A.2d 1289, 297 Conn. 902, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-papandrea-conn-2010.