State v. Pankowski
Opinion
Filed 10/19/10 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2010 ND 189
Nathan Fehl-Haber, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20100019
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Robert N. Quick, 314 East Thayer, Ste. 200, Bismarck, ND 58501, for petitioner and appellant.
Cynthia M. Feland, Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 East Thayer, Bismarck, ND 58501-4413, for respondent and appellee.
Fehl-Haber v. State
No. 20100019
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Nathan Fehl-Haber appealed from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief, arguing that an evidentiary hearing should have been held. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2010 ND 188 (State v. Pankowski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.