State v. Pankowski
This text of 2010 ND 188 (State v. Pankowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 10/19/10 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2010 ND 189
Nathan Fehl-Haber, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20100019
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Robert N. Quick, 314 East Thayer, Ste. 200, Bismarck, ND 58501, for petitioner and appellant.
Cynthia M. Feland, Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 East Thayer, Bismarck, ND 58501-4413, for respondent and appellee.
Fehl-Haber v. State
[¶1] Nathan Fehl-Haber appealed from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief, arguing that an evidentiary hearing should have been held. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2010 ND 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pankowski-nd-2010.