Fehl-Haber v. State
This text of 2010 ND 189 (Fehl-Haber v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 10/19/10 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2010 ND 188
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
David Thomas Pankowski, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20100115
Appeal from the District Court of McLean County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donald L. Jorgensen, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Ladd Ronald Erickson (submitted on brief), State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 1108, Washburn, ND 58577-1108, for plaintiff and appellee.
Ryan David Sandberg, 2525 Elk Drive, P.O. Box 1000, Minot, ND 58702-
1000, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Pankowski
[¶1] David Thomas Pankowski appeals from the district court’s judgment entered after his conditional plea to the charges of possession with intent to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance (methamphetamine) and with intent to flee or attempt to elude a police officer. Pankowski argues law enforcement did not have reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop the vehicle he was driving. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), concluding law enforcement had reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop the vehicle.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2010 ND 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fehl-haber-v-state-nd-2010.