Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Palmer

State v. Palmer

2010 Ohio 224, 124 Ohio St. 3d 282
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 2, 2010
Docket2008-2047
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2010 Ohio 224 (State v. Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Palmer, 2010 Ohio 224, 124 Ohio St. 3d 282 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated. The cause is remanded *283 to the trial court for resentencing. 1

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Scott M. Heenan, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Stephen P. Hardwick, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee. Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would dismiss the appeal as having been improvidently accepted.
1

. Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal as having been improvidently granted, filed after oral argument, is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Palmer
924 N.E.2d 845 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2010 Ohio 224, 124 Ohio St. 3d 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-palmer-ohio-2010.