State v. Palmer

2010 Ohio 224, 124 Ohio St. 3d 282
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 2, 2010·No. 2008-2047·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated. The cause is remanded *283 to the trial court for resentencing. 1

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Scott M. Heenan, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Stephen P. Hardwick, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee. Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would dismiss the appeal as having been improvidently accepted.
1

. Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal as having been improvidently granted, filed after oral argument, is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Palmer, 2010 Ohio 224, 124 Ohio St. 3d 282 (Ohio 2010).

2010 Ohio 224 (State v. Palmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Palmer
924 N.E.2d 845 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)