State v. Palmer

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Palmer

113 S.W.3d 692, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1381, 2003 WL 22048174

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 2, 2003·No. ED 81121·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Vera Palmer, appeals from her convictions for first-degree murder in violation of section 565.020.1, RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015, RSMo 2000. She challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support her convictions.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we find no error of law or otherwise. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We *693 affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Vera Palmer, appeals from her convictions for first-degree murder in violation of section 565.020.1, RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015, RSMo 2000. She challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support her convictions.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we find no error of law or otherwise. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We *693 affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).

State v. Palmer, 113 S.W.3d 692, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1381, 2003 WL 22048174 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

113 S.W.3d 692 (State v. Palmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related