Palmer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Palmer v. State

158 S.W.3d 862, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 444, 2005 WL 701656

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 29, 2005

DocketNo. ED 84735

StatusPublished

This text of 158 S.W.3d 862 (Palmer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Palmer v. State, 158 S.W.3d 862, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 444, 2005 WL 701656 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vera Palmer appeals the judgment denying her Rule 29.15 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct her judgment and sentence for murder in the first degree and armed criminal action.¹ We have reviewed [863]*863the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vera Palmer appeals the judgment denying her Rule 29.15 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct her judgment and sentence for murder in the first degree and armed criminal action.¹ We have reviewed [863]*863the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 S.W.3d 862, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 444, 2005 WL 701656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-state-moctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack