State v. Palmer

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Palmer

24 S.W.3d 719, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 38, 2000 WL 14477

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Palmer. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1487 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 11, 2000·No. No. ED 75370·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his resentence for the offense of sodomy in violation of section 566.060 RSMo Cum.Supp.1993. After remand, the trial court sentenced defendant, as a prior and persistent offender, to a term of twenty years’ imprisonment.

No error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his resentence for the offense of sodomy in violation of section 566.060 RSMo Cum.Supp.1993. After remand, the trial court sentenced defendant, as a prior and persistent offender, to a term of twenty years’ imprisonment.

No error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Palmer, 24 S.W.3d 719, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 38, 2000 WL 14477 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

24 S.W.3d 719 (State v. Palmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.