State v. Palmer
943 S.W.2d 766, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 379
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant appeals from the judgment on his conviction by a jury of sodomy in violation of § 566.060, RSMo Cum.Supp. 1993, for which he was sentenced to a term of life imprisonment. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Palmer, 943 S.W.2d 766, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 379 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).
943 S.W.2d 766 (State v. Palmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Palmer
976 S.W.2d 29 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998)