State v. Padilla

746 A.2d 452, 163 N.J. 3, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 144

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This matter has come to the Supreme Court through different procedural avenues. The Court denied defendants’ petitions for certification, which related to the unanimous portion of the Appellate Division’s judgment. 162 N.J. 198, 743 A.2d 850 (1999). Based on the partial dissent -filed in the Appellate Division and reported at 321 N.J.Super. at 112, 728 A.2d 279 (1999), the State filed an appeal as of right pursuant to Rule 2:2-1 (a)(2). In respect of that appeal, the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Kleiner’s majority opinion, reported at 321 N.J.Super. 96, 728 A.2d 279 (1999).

For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices O’HERN, STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO and LaVECCHIA — 7.

Opposed — None.