State v. P. S.
222 P.3d 762, 233 Or. App. 225, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 3
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided January 6, 2010·No. 090263168; A141512·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that, among other things, the evidence is insufficient to establish that she was a danger to herself because of a mental disorder. The state concedes that the evidence was insufficient to prove that appellant was a danger to herself. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. P. S., 222 P.3d 762, 233 Or. App. 225, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 3 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).
222 P.3d 762 (State v. P. S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Matter of Ps
222 P.3d 762 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)