In the Matter of Ps
This text of 222 P.3d 762 (In the Matter of Ps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of P.S., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
P.S., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Rebecca Carter filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General, and Tiffany Keast, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that, among other things, the evidence is insufficient to establish that she was a danger to herself because of a mental disorder. The state concedes that the evidence was insufficient to prove that appellant was a danger to herself. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 P.3d 762, 233 Or. App. 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-ps-orctapp-2010.