State v. P. J. Y.

197 P.3d 626, 224 Or. App. 455, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1758
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided December 10, 2008·No. 080261273; A138239·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The trial court entered an order of involuntary commitment on the ground that appellant is a danger to himself because of a mental disorder. On appeal, appellant contends that there is insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s order. The state agrees. On de novo review, so do we.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. P. J. Y., 197 P.3d 626, 224 Or. App. 455, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1758 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

197 P.3d 626 (State v. P. J. Y.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Matter of Pjy
197 P.3d 626 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)