In Matter of Pjy
This text of 197 P.3d 626 (In Matter of Pjy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of P.J.Y., Alleged to be a Mentally III Person.
State of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
P.J.Y., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Lance D. Perdue, Portland, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Jeremy C. Rice, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The trial court entered an order of involuntary commitment on the ground that appellant is a danger to himself because of a mental disorder. On appeal, appellant contends *627 that there is insufficient evidence to support the trial court's order. The state agrees. On de novo review, so do we.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 P.3d 626, 224 Or. App. 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-matter-of-pjy-orctapp-2008.