State v. Overgaard

496 P.3d 1159, 315 Or. App. 86
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 6, 2021
DocketA173342
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 496 P.3d 1159 (State v. Overgaard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Overgaard, 496 P.3d 1159, 315 Or. App. 86 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Submitted September 9, affirmed October 6, petition for review denied December 23, 2021 (369 Or 110)

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ERIC OVERGAARD, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 19CR60065; A173342 496 P3d 1159

Theodore E. Sims, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Sara F. Werboff, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Carson L. Whitehead, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and DeHoog, Judge, and Mooney, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Lobue, 304 Or App 13, 466 P3d 83, rev den, 367 Or 257 (2020).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Espy
496 P.3d 1159 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
496 P.3d 1159, 315 Or. App. 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-overgaard-orctapp-2021.